Refugee crises are not going away......

 


A few years back, when I was working in Amsterdam and Britain was unaccountably trying to leave the EU, the entire continent was engulfed in a wave of migrants trying to find a better life.  Cue much hand wringing and panic stories of "terrorists" being in the vanguard.  Boatload after boatload of refugees and economic migrants from across the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa braved the Med in flimsy inflatables provided at extortionate cost by so-called people smugglers, aiming at Greece and Italy, the EU's southern outposts, from the North African coast.  Thousands died but thousands more made it to islands like Lesbos and Lampadusa.  There were no welcoming committees, only police and troops escorting them to transit camps, tent cities on the edge of dusty towns, where they relied on charities to provide them with food and water and medical aid.  Many remain there still.  

The nationalists like LePen and Salvini, Johnson and Farage, Kaczynski and Orban raged long and loud at this outrage: how dare these people "invade our lands", they are "not wanted" here, they are vagrants, they are terrorists, Islamic extremists, workshy good-for-nothings, unChristian heathens......and they are among the more polite epithets being bandied around.  More moderate politicians, such as Tusk and Cameron and Macron and notably Merkel, while not exactly fulsome with praise, at least struck a more conciliatory tone and recognised the people needed support and, under international law, were entitled to assistance and asylum from the first "friendly" nation they arrived at and claimed asylum in.  The EU cobbled together a plan that obliged member states to "take in" varying numbers of migrants to ease the crushing burden on Italy and Greece, neither among the wealthiest countries, and maintain some kind of balance across the continent.  Germany pledged to take in more than a million (Merkel taking that decision unilaterally, much to the horror of some of her own cabinet, never mind public), Britain agreed to take in something like 10,000 (of which over a year later only a couple of hundred had actually arrived, despite Britain being being listed as the "favoured destination" of many migrants).  Orban built a wall along the Hungarian border and sent in the troops to stop anyone arriving, and Kaczynski insisted that, with in excess of a million refugees fleeing the war in Ukraine Poland had "no room" for any more foreigners.

But things quietened down a bit over the next few years and the flood became a trickle. Boats still arrived every summer, following the same routes, and more braved the Channel to carry migrants from France to Britain.  People, including little kids, continued to die untimely and lonely deaths. They still do.

While all this was going on in Europe, there were similar issues in other parts of the world.  Stories were aired of flotillas of boat people braving the Pacific and the waters between Malaysia, the Phillipines and IndoChina and Australia, with the same pressing needs: abandoning their homes amid conflict and religious and ethnic persecution in search of safety and a better life (where have we heard that before?).  Australia intercepted those that didn't drown and gathered them in a transit camp on a dusty insect and rat ridden tropical island. Many are still there.  Across the Atlantic, columns of refugees walked through much of Central America, from as far away as corrupt and penniless Ecuador, through Honduras and Costa Rica and Mexico, aiming at the Land of the Free, the USA, all searching desperately for precisely the same thing.  The welcoming committee in Mexico introduced people smugglers to the equation there, too, and the US response, especially under Trump, was as brutal.  Trump was elected on a promise to build "a big beautiful wall" the length of the 2000 odd mile border, paid for by Mexico.  By the time he was voted out he'd completed about 50 miles of it and received not a buck from his southern neighbour.  But his Homeland Security Border Force had managed to deport thousands of "illegals" back the way they had come, separating thousands of children from their parents, locking them in cages and later detention centres. The chances of families being reunited after this was described as "highly unlikely". 

I commented on all this nonsense in some posts on my old blog, "Around The World In 80 Expense Claims" (http://travellin-bob.blogspot.com): I don't maintain it now but they are still there in the Archive if you want to look. 

But the problem never went away.  It's still going on.  Only the victims and the route have changed, for Europe at least.

------------------------------------------------------------

For the last couple of months, I've watched on Polish tv, the situation unfolding on the country's eastern border with Belarus, home of Europe's Last Dictator Lukashenko, who lost an election a couple of years back, arrested or exiled all opposition and remains in control, propped up by his best bud Putin. Belarus is at the front of the new migrant route, and it seems the dictator is at the forefront.

There is compelling evidence that migrants, mostly from Syria and Afghanistan and Iraq (especially Iraqi Kurds) are making their way through Turkey and onto flights from Istanbul to Minsk.  Others allegedly follow a route through Abu Dhabi.  The travel agency that is said to organise these flights in owned and run by Lukashenko's son.......  From Minsk, they are put on fleets of buses to the borders of Poland (and Lithuania and Latvia, all of whom are full EU and NATO member states) and forced to hike through forests, often at gunpoint, by Belarus forces, and forced to cross.  In Poland (and possibly Lithuania and Latvia) they are met by army and border guards, once again armed, and forced to go back to Belarus.  

On Polish tv and the few remaining independent news providers (most have been taken under government control in a throwback to communist times) there is video evidence of all this going on. The government has responded by sealing off the border area and erecting a double coiled razor wire fence along its entire length.  A bill was passed last week approving the construction of a high "impenetrable" brick wall, complete with infrared cameras and motion sensors, to replace it. The migrants, trapped in a forest with night time temperatures dropping below zero now, and with little in the way of clothes, food, water, medical supplies and money, driven by desperation and Belarusian arms, have been filmed trying to cut through the razor wire with new wire and bolt cutters (now, just where did those tools come from, I wonder....?) with armed troops egging them on and Poles with pepper spray forcing them back.

There have been fatalities. Many of the refugees are women (some heavily pregnant) and kids.  Aid agencies are being kept away by the border forces, so it seems likely that more atrocities are being carried out that have as yet not come to light.  Even the Church, in an unusual move given the close cooperation between the government and the clergy in Poland, has been refused permission to interfere and assist the migrants.  A debate in the Polish parliament yesterday warned that the situation will get worse and Poles should expect "an armed invasion".... whether by refugees (where do they get their weapons from? How??) or the Belarus forces (could Lukashenko and/or Putin be THAT stupid? I doubt it....).  And the weather is worsening.

-----------------------------------------------------------

This sort of thing simply should not be happening in a civilized world in the 21st century, and any government that is complicit should be deeply ashamed and brought to account.  Let's start with the Western Allies.  America and its closest partners led by Britain, France, Germany, Poland and others, invaded and carried out military operations - let's use the correct term: wars - in Afghanistan and Iraq for 20 years until this summer, leaving devastated and ungovernable countries behind with their pull-out  They made little real attempt to limit the domestic conflicts, civil wars, in Libya, Syria and, again, Iraq after the Arab Spring - another 10 years of government sanctioned murder.  They continue by their support of Israel to stoke the hotbed that is the old conflict (perhaps genocide) on Palestine by Israel.  Many of these refugees stuck in the cold Polish forest and the camps in Lesbos and Lampedusa are from Syria, from Afghanistan, from Libya......  

Let's call out the nationalist politicians across these same Western allies who have ramped up the racist anti Islamist rhetoric that has infected the politics of this world and inflamed passions (including mine, but in a different way) and turned anyone with a different coloured skin, a different religion and a different way of life into a collection of demons.  Here's to you messrs Trump, Salvini, Orban, Kaczynski, Netanyahu, Putin, Lukashenko, Farage, Johnson and Raab (oh, and Miz Patel and Mme LePen) - to name but a few: feel free to add to the list as you see fit.

Let me be clear here.  The migrants are not sub-humans - and anyone who terms them so is simply following on from those other monsters from years ago Hitler and Stalin, who used similar rhetoric against the Jews and the Poles and the Gypsies and the Slavs and unleashed the horrors of World War 2 that continue to haunt this world all these years later.  Nor are they terrorists, of any stripe, whether  al-Qaeda, ISIS or some splinter group we've never heard of.  They're not even all Muslim, not even all young men (a very lazy and ignorant euphemism used for "terrorist" when used in connection with migrants).  There are Christians among them, many women and kids - 5, 10 years old, starving, in need of help, who have known nothing but war and suffering throughout their short lives (and may not live long enough to know anything else). They may simply come from the wrong part of town, speak with the wrong accent, been forced from bombed-out apartment blocks and demolished neighbourhoods because there is no other thing to do.

They want safety.  Security.  Somewhere to lay down in the warm and sleep without nightmares.  A job. Money to feed and clothe themselves and their families (those that are left).  In that, they're much the same as the rest of us.  But they are damaged already by what they have been through - what gives us - gives anybody! - the right to damage them further?

This is the shame of the West.  Of America.  Of Britain.  Of Europe.

-----------------------------------------------------------

And consider this.  The migrant crisis that is polluting this world because of man's inhumanity to man, right now, is mostly down to wars of one kind or another.

What will happen if countries fail to live up to their COP26 pledges?  What if we, as a supposedly intelligent species, fail for break our addiction to fossil fuels, fails to reduce emissions and keep temperature rises below this mythical 1.5 degrees?  What if climate change fails to slow down but continues to accelerate and sea levels rise, ice caps melt faster, temperatures continue to rise, island nations drown, deserts expand, arable land disappears?  Entire nations start to move, seeking sanctuary.....  Instead of hundreds of thousands of migrants there are hundreds of millions?

What then?

Comments

  1. What then indeed Bob! These are troubled times. As part of my history degree I did a module on migration. I learned that in the 1950s Western nations were proud tom offer refugee status to people fleeing Societ controlled Eastern Europe. The "right type of refugee" was welecomed with open arms all over Europe, North America and Australia. The UN declared1959 as "World Refugee Year"; the objective of which was to " to find solutions such as resettlement or local integration
    that would improve the lives of refugees around the world"

    Whose idea was that do yoy think?

    The idea came frpm the British Conservative Party

    How times have changed

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They have indeed, Andrew. What is happening here is nothing short of a disgrace, a war crime without the war. Tomorrow is our Independence Day bank holiday, and it is traditionally marked by marches through various cities to celebrate, the biggest being here in Warsaw. The last few years the tone has gone from friendship and solidarity, with much flag waving and laughter, to last year's nationalist riot led by a bunch of neo nazi thugs who moonlight as security details for politicians and at football matches - all balaclavas and combat trousers. The highlight was a molotov cocktail thrown through the window of a third floor balcony that was displaying a rainbow LGBT flag. No-one hurt but the flat burned out. The police turned a blind eye, of course, and politicians from the ruling party dismissed it as a "boisterous behaviour". Yeah, right....

      Delete
  2. This is a post , word for word, that I posted on your Facebook comment on the refugee crisis. Unbelievably, Facebook has told me it's not allowed and has removed it , so you won't have seen it. I have no idea why it's not allowed . I can only think that they think my ref to COP refers to police , instead of Conference Of the Parties .
    .
    "Certainly never going away, but until countries can get together to address the problem , it will only get worse. We need a COP on the refugee crisis. Unfortunately, I can't see this happening anytime soon. "

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Bob. A very good and detailed summary of the position as it stands and how it has developed. Just a small point , at present I would not describe Macron as a moderate, and Merkel allowed all the Turkish immigrants in to run the German Car Industry !!. That asise I would have to agree with you re Refugees/Immigrants . There is no easy solution and it risks becoming not only a Civil problem but a potential for War if Russia /China continue with their attitude towards so called dissidents in their own countries without trying to cause mayhem within Europe. Sean made the point about a COP on refugee crisis and I think that ,if it could be organised would be a good thing. If we don't solve this crisis then any plans to sort out Climate control could fall flat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Mike. Re Macron: at the time of the Med migrant crisis, what, 5 years ago, he was more moderate than he is now IMO. And what Merkel did with her influx is her (their) business - Germany has a history of allowing Turks in. I remember spending an awful week in a hostel near Frankfurt where I was only non-Turk staying there, and this was back in the mid 80s!

      As to the situation here, Poland is now calling up its version of the Territoral Army (the reservists) to deploy on the border, is openly statinf all Poles should prepare for an "armed invasion" and called NATO to intervene. All very touchy.......but still have to believe Putin will somehw rein in Lukashenko before the situation worsen more. A war here would be in no-ones interests....least of all the poor sods stuck in the forest.

      Finally a COP For Migrants will have to do a whole lot better than the climate ones are doing, and all the time China, India and Russia (and arguably Australia) refuse to take it seriously those are doomed to failure. As you say, there are no easy answers and I fear for my grandkids' futures the way things are going right now......

      Delete
  4. Hi again Bob. No I agree with what y say about Macron, but he is fighting for hid life and you have Barnier talking rubbish now he trying to be President. As for Merkjel she opened the flood gates and now Germany is suffering. Nobody wants a War and most of it is Sabre Rattling , but Russia & China are dangerous and as you say Climate Change to these guys is rubbish so they are hardly going to take Immigration seriously either . Ukraine suffered badly in WW2 and we have to stand ny

    by them as much as possible. Problem is that the foundations for a War are being laid just like before WW1 and we know where that led. As for future I am more optimistic about our Grandchildren, they will sort something else and we must remain positive in supporting the right causes , not Greta Thunberg and her choreographed nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Morning. Lot to unwrap there, Mike, but I'll have a go.

      Macron is fighting for his political life, and a recent Barnier interview I saw on HardTalk (BBC World) suggests Macron has little to worry about from him! I would suggest LePen is a bigger threat. Merkel didn't open the floodgates: they were all wide open already. What she did do was coerce other EU states to join Germany in a joint humanitarian effort to give the migrants a chance to survive and ease the huge burden falling on Greece and Italy. I'm not sure Germany is suffering as a direct result of her accepting a million plus refugees but I have no doubt it is a factor in the rise in nationalist parties there as elsewhere. To be fair to both Macron and Merkel, they are at least being pro-active as regards the border situation here: the tv news this morning that they have both been on the phone to Lukashenko and Putin, as has Biden, telling them to pull back and help resolve the problem rather than, as you rightly describe it it, rattling sabres. I am hopeful and in my view they should be commended.

      I would argue the migrant crisis has been caused as a direct result of the inequalities across the world that richer nations are not prepared to admit. in Europe I believe it to be a direct result of forces led by the US and Britain, with other NATO allies, storming into Iraq and Afghanistan, overthrowing governments (admittedly of questionable validity) but having no clear plan about what to do next. Result? A power vacuum. The same happened in Libya after Gaddafi fell. Similar issues could have something to with the migrant movements in central America and Asia, but with different players. Ukraine is a different story altogether.

      I would also argue that the overwhelming "right cause" globally now is climate change, and whether choreographed or not Greta Thunberg's actions, like her or loathe her, have done far more to raise its profile over the last three or four years than anyone else, including good old David Attenborough, managed in a generation (and that is not to slight what Attenborough, Prince Charles, David Bellamy and other environmentalists have done previously). She appeals to young people in away her elders simply do not, and it's the young people who will have clean up the mess - it's right that they, and her, should be at the forefront.

      Back at ya, buddy!

      Delete
  5. Generally cannot argue at all. No simple answer but lets be positive

    ReplyDelete
  6. I find it remarkable that when Attenborough speaks on the dangers of climate change , we all listen and accept that he is right , yet when Thunberg speaks on exactly the same dangers , many people think she's a silly little girl that should be ignored. Admittedly , nearly all her critics are antediluvians, who can't accept any facts when they come from an 18year old girl and they all seem to hate anyone who identifies as an activist. Fortunately , most young people identify with her words and give her the respect that she deserves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. On the button, as ever, Sean!

      Delete
  7. Hi Bob, After reading your blog, herein are some comments. There is a fundamental difference between asylum seeking refugees fleeing persecution and war, and economic migrants looking for a better life. The initial waves were from the Syrian war, and the refugees were mainly sheltered by Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. Those making it to Greece were initially welcomed! When that trickle, become a flood, many residents of the affected Greek islands turned against the refugees due to increased crime, vandalism, etc. In 2015 Merkel opened the gates into Germany for 1M Refugees, whom subsequently went thru an asylum process.

    Meanwhile, a trickle and then a flood of mainly African economic migrants via Libya and Tunisa risked sea crossing to Italy, with similar initial positive, and then negative reactions from the affected Italian populations. The same economic migrations have been taking place into the US, and more recently into the UK. In all these cases, large sections of the voting public have moved from moderate to right wing, giving rise to politicians like Trump, Johnson, Salvini, Orban, Kaczynski, etc. Recently we have the Belarus engineered crisis, where some thousands of economic migrants are camped out on the Poland border.

    Leaving aside all the statements about Hitler, Stalin, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, etc, Western Govts (only!!), name labelling, sanctioned murder (really?), and so on...........the key issue / challenge is what to do about the economic migrants. It's no use crying Shame, and just saying economic migrants want and should be given a roof, a bed, a job, etc. How will this be funded and be done? Who will teach the language/culture of the host nations before the migrants can be a contributor, instead of a taker. By going the route of just granting every wish, or demand, of the economic migrants, the flood will become a tsunami, with ultra-right govts coming into power, and resultant utter chaos or worse.


    In every case, the economic migrants govts are corrupt and/or dysfunctional, and care not for the general public. Biden has in last couple days announced a 100Billion USD development fund for S.American disadvantaged peoples. A similar undertaking by the EU, UK, China (? hahaha), and other wealthy nations should be undertaken, with funding going directly to the development projects, and managed by the funding nation. Japan and UAE are excellent examples of this! No doubt other intelligent solutions will be tabled, hopefully in the near future.

    Sadly, once the Belarus/Poland border blows over, not the latest headline, the many theorists will move onto the next hot topic. Where is all the hand wringing and outrage about the Rohingya refugees, or worse Uighur victims? Gone, cause its old news. Wouldn't it be wonderful if there were as many long-term activists / direct contributors, as theorists (present company excluded, lol)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Ian Aberdein - AKA Unknown!

      Just a brief response to your epic reply - a good first response, well played, mate! - to say I broadly agree with you. The difference between asylum seekers and economic migrants is quite narrow, it seems to me, and I think largely meaningless except as a handy tool to practice another form of discrimination. Whichever category the person is counted under, the bottom line is he/she is still just looking for a chance to live a safer, better and more productive life away from the war zone or poverty he has left behind and I really can't see any justifiable reason to treat them differently. When you think about it, half of johnson's Cabinet are from migrant backgrounds - which makes Patel in particular, with her extreme views and policies, particularly hard to stomach - and the US and Australia (two other rampantly anti-migrant countries) have been built on welcoming migrants from all nations. Hypocracy at its worst. Your point about the Rohingya and Uighar crisis is well made, and you could add to it the situations developing in Yemen, Ethiopia and Myanmar more generally. Even the Palestinian genocide by Israel has not and will not go away any time soon.

      Seems to me the world is a very sick and bigotted place right now, even without considering the climate change disaster that is unfolding.

      Delete
    2. Ian's e-mailed response:

      Bob, Briefly and for clarity:- You say there is no difference between refugees and migrants, and migrants have the right to seek a better life. So, migrants can cross any EU border, and travel to their desired EU country, or to the UK? There, they must be housed, feed and be given work? I repeat, who is going to pay for this, and how will it be done?

      Given your scenario, is there any reason for border controls, and if so, what? How will at least +100M African migrants (living in poverty) be accommodated in the EU and UK?

      Also, why do you state Israel has committed genocide against the Palestinians without any supporting facts, in a blog about migration? C'mon Bob, surely that is a bigoted approach in itself?

      Delete
    3. Morning, Ian.

      I would suggest anyone has the right to a better life - including you and I! - and see no logical reason why that should not involve re-locating to another to country to find it. As you and I both did. The difference is we did it while in employment and not fleeing from some gangster governments or war zone - for which I give thanks! In terms of the migrants arriving (or trying to) in Europe, they are doing so for broadly the same reasons - safety, work and a future: a better life - but using dubious means to get here, out of desperation rather than choice. Should they be stigmatized, dumped in transit camps for months or years while their requests to stay are processed at a snail's pace? Or should they be allowed to find work, no matter how manual or unpleasant, to pay for that accomodation, food, clothes etc? I don't know the answer to that, but recognise the problems such costs are causing. Hence the need for a Migrant COP ....?

      As to border controls more generally, of course I'm in favour, provided they are conducted fairly and reasonably and not at gunpoint. Border controls should NOT be used as a way to stop people travelling, but aimed at preventing illegal activities - drug and arms smuggling, kidnapping kids, circumventing customs duties and so on. You could argue that migrants trying to cross a border is illegal - but if they do so and claim asylum (which most do) they are entitled to do so under UN Treaties most countries have signed up to and should be treated accordingly, not as animals.

      As to Israel. Point 1: there is plenty of evidence in the public domain to support my virew, not least the building of settlements on Palestinian land, and the eviction of Palestinians from their own homes on that same land to house Israelis - this is known to be against international law, no matter what messrs Trump and Netanyahu may try to say. There is the Gaza strip, overcrowded and lacking space and medicines and food supplies because of an Israeli blockade of Gaza port and border check points. There is also a book called The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Israeli (note that....) historian Ilan Pappe that deals with Israeli government policy since 1948 that is aimed specifically at eradicating Palestinians from the neighbourhood. I bought it in a Tel Aviv bookshop and it's a harrowing read. Point 2: given that there are a number of Palestinians amongst the migrants we're discussing (even if not in those at the Polish border) then I think it's as relevant to a post about migration as your points about the Uighers and Rohingya, don't you? I stand fully behind my point.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A State of Mind......

Facing trials.